Research Article | Open Access
Validity and reliability of qualitative research
Dr. Melloud Sidali, Dr. Trifa Mohamed
Pages: 471-485
Abstract
The present article examines the necessary conditions for conducting scientific work, with a particular emphasis on the quality and value of the results produced. Every scientific discourse must imperatively meet requirements of clarity, coherence, and reliability. Epistemological choices and associated methods play a crucial role in research, as they ensure targeted, efficient, and valid data collection. This article primarily focuses on the works of Guba and Lincoln regarding the theme of naturalistic inquiry and its criteria for validity. This new paradigm of "naturalistic inquiry" is contrasted with the conventional or rationalistic paradigm to highlight its advantages. By analyzing and comparing these approaches, the article explores how naturalistic inquiry provides a promising alternative for scientific research, offering an innovative perspective on how to approach complex phenomena in the real world.
Keywords
Epistemology, Methodology, Naturalistic Inquiry, Trustworthiness